NIKE Women's Mc Trainer Training Shoe

Product Information

The MC Trainer 2’s heel feels more forgiving for running and jumping and the base of the forefoot seems to articulate a lot easier in this model, and this model broke in a lot easier than the MC Trainer. Another thing to like about this model for lifting is that I feel as though it articulates a little better than the previous MC Trainer and other budget-friendly training shoes. When doing sled work and lunges, this shoe’s toe box offered a fair amount of flexibility.

This shoe’s midsole provides a nice level of stability for heavier lifting sessions, and it also has a nice level of responsiveness for plyometrics and athletic-style workouts. If you like shoes with firmer midsoles, you’ll enjoy this about the MC Trainer 2. For wide and flat feet, I think you’ll also want to pass on this shoe. Since they have a low-profile construction, I think sizing up could be problematic and lead to heel slip issues. It can be an okay budget model for hybrid workouts that have short runs programmed. This shoe’s firmer ride can get pretty uncomfortable for longer runs, so I’d suggest exploring models that are more running-friendly if you need a shoe for this ask.

Takeaway Thoughts

While I like the Nike MC Trainer 2 and think it’s better than the original model, there are a few cons to note about this shoe before investing in them. The model was designed with a wide sole to provide you with sufficient support for classic strength exercises such as squats and deadlifts. Additional stability and a longer service life provide overlays in the area of ​​the toes and the lacing. A cushioning midsole has been incorporated to provide the necessary dynamics for explosive exercises such as sprints or burpees. The cushioning foam it contains absorbs the resulting pressure and enables training that is easy on the joints. The high responsiveness of the sole improves your agility. Lateral Support and Varied Grip I noticed that the tongue on this model moved during a few of my training sessions that had more lateral movement programmed, and I noticed it was tough at times to get the tongue to lay flush when putting these shoes on. For versatile training, I enjoyed the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2 and think it has an edge over the original model in this context, and that’s for two reasons.

The second aspect to like about the Nike MC Trainer 2 is its performance for athletic-style training. If you’re someone who on a weekly basis likes to lift, do HIIT workouts, do plyometrics, do agility work, and even some sprints, the MC Trainer 2 can be a good option to explore. Since we all have different weekly training breakdowns and biases, it can be useful to cross-reference how different shoes will perform in different settings and align with your training needs. For daily wear, I’d suggest passing on this model. With the heel slip issue, I ran into with this model, I’ve been less than impressed with this shoe’s performance for all-day wear and longer walks.Note, when training and tightening this shoe, I didn’t have slip issues, which is a positive thing for those that just want this model for training. However, if you are like me and enjoy wearing your training shoes on a daily wear basis, this could be a deal breaker. This shoe’s midsole provides a nice level of stability and when working with trap bar deadlifts over 425 lbs, I didn’t notice any glaring compression issues with this shoe. I also liked the level of tread the outsole provided on different surfaces. But if you have wide feet, this is probably not your best bet. It could even seem a little tight if you have a mid-range foot.

Additionally, these will not be the best CrossFit shoes on the market. They’ll work for casual WODs here and there but will fall short as you get more niche and serious with your training. The lifting performance with these shoes will be best for casual and recreational sessions. Testing the Nike MC Trainer 2 for Versatile Training

Supportive Upper with Breathable Properties

The Nike SuperRep Go 3 Next Nature Flyknit also suffers from this issue and it can be frustrating, to say the least. The Nike MC Trainer utilized two tongue loops that sat lower on the tongue, while the MC Trainer 2 only has one loop and Nike has brought it up. For the Nike MC Trainer 2, if you have narrow or neutral (normal) width feet, then you should be safe going true to size in this model. This model’s length runs true and it has a narrow and neutral width or a more athletic fit. Over the course of my training sessions and review process with the Nike MC Trainer 2, I’ve found multiple things to like about this model. Overall, I’ve enjoyed the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2 for versatile training. They’re a consistent model that delivers a strong performance for the price, and they can be a good shoe to beat up for both indoor and outdoor workouts. Testing the Nike MC Trainer 2 for Short Runs and Daily Wear are looking for something to regularly run in (the Nike Free Metcon 3 is a good cross-training shoe for running)