Army Regulation AR 623-3 Personnel Evaluation - Evaluation Reporting System 5 June 2012

Product Information

SERVICE OBLIGATIONS, METHODS OF FULFILLMENT, PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS, AND ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS PARTICIPATION IN A MILITARY OR CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT SAFETY INVESTIGATION {OPNAVIST 3750.16C, COMDTINST 5100.28, AFI 91-206} HTTPS://WWW.SECNAV.NAVY.MIL/DONI/DIRECTIVES/ THE NAVY IS THE LEAD PROPONENT FOR THIS REGULATION. As expressed in AR 623-3, an OER appeal needs to be well-written and supported by evidence. The assistance of a military lawyer is advisable.

An OER appeal, if successful, can result in complete removal of the OER in question or only the deletion of certain comments. Furthermore, if the appeal is successful, the board will determine if the OER was seen by any previous promotion boards and if reconsideration of said promotion is warranted. If the OER appeal is not successful, a copy of the board's decision memorandum will be filed in the Officer's OMPF. While it is unlikely, it is possible for the Board to deny the appeal and make the OER in question worse. IDENTIFICATION CARDS FOR MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES, THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE PERSONNEL {AFI 36–3026_IPV1/AR 600–8–14/BUPERS INST 1750.10D/MCO 5512.11E/COMDTINST M5512.1B/NOAA CORPS DIRECTIVES, CHAPTER 1, PART 5/COMMISSIONED CORPS MANUAL 29.2/INSTRUCTIONS 1 AND 2} (CERTIFIED CURRENT BY ARMY ON 10/21/2020.) Regardless of whether a Commander's/Commandant's inquiry was conducted, and regardless of any OER Comment, an Officer can appeal any evaluation received. If an OER appeal is based only on an administrative error, it should be sent to HRC, Evaluations Appeals Branch (AHRC-PDV-EA). Administrative errors include, but are not limited to, deviation from established rating chain, insufficient period of observation by the rating officials, signature errors in the evaluation report period, and errors in the APFT and/or height/weight entries. Administrative errors that were known, or should have been known, by the rated Officer and/or rating officials at the time that the evaluation report was signed, will not be corrected. A mandatory supplementary review is required for NCOERs when a senior rater within the rated NCOs rating chain includes an NCO in the rank of SFC through 1SG/MSG, warrant officer in the rank of WO1 through CW2, and Army officer in the rank of 2LT and 1LT. This supplementary review will be performed by a uniformed Army Soldier, senior to the senior rater within the rated NCO’s organization in the rank of SGM/CSM, CW3 through CW5, or CPT and above. This Army Soldier will be designated as a uniformed Army advisor. The uniformed Army advisor will monitor evaluation practices and provide assistance and advice needed to rating officials (as required) on matters pertaining to Army evaluations. The uniformed Army advisor will be identified on the published rating scheme at the beginning of the evaluation period by the commander establishing the rating chain.At the end of the rating period, the service member is given the evaluation report. Officers are rated among their peers. Their peers consist of other Offi... DELAY IN REPORTING FOR AND EXEMPTION FROM ACTIVE DUTY, INITIAL ACTIVE DUTY FOR TRAINING, AND RESERVE FORCES DUTY JOINT AIRDROP INSPECTION RECORDS, MALFUNCTION/INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS, AND ACTIVITY REPORTING {OPNAVINST 4630.24D; AFJ 13 210(I); MCO 13480.1D} Officers twice non-selected for promotion with a discharge date; Officers selected for release within 6 months by an HQDA/AGR elimination board; Officers recommended for elimination within 6 months; and, Officers notified of eligibility of an HQDA selection command board within 6 months Each supervisor formally evaluates his subordinates twice a year. Marks gained on the performance evaluation cards are converted to numerical scores, which a...

Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports have a direct and significant impact on the NCO’s promotion selection process. These reports are more than likely ... For all evaluation reports, if previously reported information later proves to be incorrect or erroneous, the Soldier will be notified and advised of the right to appeal the evaluation report in accordance with chapter 4. Commander's/Commandant's inquiries are not a required step to otherwise appeal an OER. They should be requested in very specific situations and Officers should be careful not to make a request that is only going to shed negative light on him/her. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) SHELF LIFE MATERIEL QUALITY CONTROL STORAGE STANDARDS {DLAR (JP) 4155.37; NAVSUPINST 4410.56B; AFMAN 23-232(IP); MCO 4450.I 3B}

Card Range To Study

CONTRACTOR`S FLIGHT AND GROUND OPERATIONS {DCMA INST 8210-1D; AFI 10-220; NAVAIRINST 3710.1H; COMDTINST M13020.3B}

USE OF U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION-REGULATED INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCTS IN HUMANS INCLUDING SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARMED FORCES DISCIPLINARY CONTROL BOARDS AND OFF-INSTALLATION LIAISON AND OPERATIONS {OPNAVINST 1620.2A; AFI 31-213; MCO 1620.2D; COMDTINST 1620.1E} MANAGEMENT OF ARMY INDIVIDUAL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES - THIS EDITION REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 20 DECEMBER 2023APPOINTMENT OF RESERVE COMMISSIONED OFFICERS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO ARMY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT BRANCHES (REPRINTED W/BASIC INCL C1-4) The HQDA receipt of evaluation reports after the required receipt date, or past a suspense date directed by an HQDA selection board, will not be an automatic basis for appealing either the evaluation report or selection board results. Establish and maintain positive expectations and attitudes to support effective work behaviors and healthy relationships; improve the organization while accomplishing the mission. Any mention of unproven derogatory information in an evaluation report can become an appealable matter if the derogatory information is shown to be unfounded. (AR 623-3 para 3-20) Although the program brought anxieties to the managers, however, it was received and it is now being used on more than five hundred managers in that director...